In a significant development that has quelled rising speculations and restored calm within Nigeria’s socio-political and traditional spheres, the Idoma Area Traditional Council (IATC) in Benue State has categorically dismissed claims that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s name was ever included on a list of revoked chieftaincy titles. The council’s statement, issued on Tuesday, September 9, 2025, has put to rest a controversy that had sparked debates across traditional, political, and media circles in Nigeria, particularly in the Idoma nation. The clarification underscores the sanctity of traditional institutions and their commitment to maintaining transparency and integrity in the conferment and management of honorary titles.
The IATC, the highest traditional authority in Idomaland, located in Benue State, addressed the issue in response to circulating rumors that suggested President Tinubu’s chieftaincy title, conferred by the Idoma traditional leadership, had been revoked or was under consideration for revocation. These rumors, which gained traction in certain online platforms and social media spaces, threatened to undermine the revered traditional institution and its longstanding relationship with prominent figures in Nigeria’s political landscape. The council’s swift intervention highlights its proactive stance in addressing misinformation and preserving the cultural heritage of the Idoma people.
Background: The Idoma People and Their Traditional Institution
To fully appreciate the significance of this clarification, it is essential to understand the historical and cultural context of the Idoma people and their traditional governance structure. The Idoma are one of the major ethnic groups in Benue State, Nigeria, predominantly residing in the southern part of the state. They are known for their rich cultural heritage, vibrant festivals, and a deep-rooted respect for their traditional institutions, which play a pivotal role in governance, conflict resolution, and community cohesion.
The Idoma Area Traditional Council, headed by the Och’Idoma, the paramount ruler of Idomaland, is the apex body responsible for overseeing traditional affairs in the region. The Och’Idoma, currently His Royal Majesty, Agabaidu Elias Ikoyi Obekpa, holds a position of immense reverence and authority, serving as the custodian of Idoma customs and traditions. The council comprises other traditional rulers, chiefs, and community leaders who collectively ensure the preservation of Idoma cultural values while fostering unity and development within the region.
Chieftaincy titles in Idomaland, as in many Nigerian cultures, are prestigious honors bestowed upon individuals who have made significant contributions to society, whether through public service, philanthropy, or exemplary leadership. These titles are not merely symbolic; they carry deep cultural and spiritual significance, often binding the recipient to the community in a lifelong relationship of mutual respect and responsibility. The conferment of such titles is a meticulous process, guided by tradition and consultation, and any decision to revoke a title is equally rigorous, reserved for exceptional circumstances such as gross misconduct or actions deemed detrimental to the community’s values.
The Controversy: Origins and Spread of the Rumor
The controversy surrounding President Tinubu’s chieftaincy title appears to have originated from unverified reports and social media posts that suggested the IATC was reviewing or had revoked a title allegedly conferred on him. While the original article does not specify the exact title in question, it is worth noting that President Tinubu, a prominent Yoruba leader and one of Nigeria’s most influential political figures, has received numerous chieftaincy titles from various ethnic groups across the country, reflecting his national stature and contributions to Nigeria’s political and economic development.
The rumor gained momentum in the context of Nigeria’s complex socio-political landscape, where traditional institutions often intersect with politics. Misinformation about title revocations can be particularly damaging, as such actions are rare and carry significant implications for both the individual and the conferring community. In this case, the suggestion that President Tinubu’s title was revoked sparked debates about the motivations behind such a move, with some speculating about political undertones, given Tinubu’s role as Nigeria’s president since May 2023.
The IATC’s statement, however, has made it clear that no such revocation was ever contemplated. According to the council, President Tinubu’s name was never on any list of revoked titles, and the claims were baseless. The council’s spokesperson, whose identity was not disclosed in the original report, emphasized that the Idoma traditional institution operates with transparency and would not engage in such actions without due process. The statement also urged the public to disregard the rumors and refrain from spreading unverified information that could tarnish the reputation of the council or the individuals involved.
The IATC’s Response: A Commitment to Truth and Tradition
The Idoma Area Traditional Council’s prompt response to the controversy reflects its commitment to upholding the integrity of its processes and protecting the sanctity of its traditional honors. The council’s statement was not only a rebuttal of the rumors but also a reaffirmation of its role as a custodian of truth and cultural heritage. By addressing the issue head-on, the IATC demonstrated its awareness of the potential consequences of misinformation, particularly in an era where social media can amplify falsehoods and create unnecessary tensions.
The council’s clarification also serves as a reminder of the importance of verifying information before disseminating it. In Nigeria, where traditional institutions wield significant influence, rumors about chieftaincy titles can have far-reaching implications, including straining relationships between communities and prominent figures. The IATC’s proactive stance in debunking the rumor underscores its dedication to maintaining harmony and fostering unity, both within Idomaland and in its interactions with national leaders like President Tinubu.
President Tinubu’s Relationship with Idomaland
While the original article does not delve into the specifics of President Tinubu’s connection to Idomaland, it is worth exploring the broader context of his relationship with Nigeria’s diverse ethnic groups. As a former governor of Lagos State (1999–2007) and a key figure in Nigeria’s democratic journey, Tinubu has built bridges across the country’s ethnic and regional divides. His political career, spanning decades, has been marked by strategic alliances and a commitment to national unity, earning him recognition from various traditional institutions.
It is not uncommon for prominent Nigerians to receive chieftaincy titles from communities outside their ethnic groups as a mark of respect for their contributions to national development. In Tinubu’s case, his leadership in the All Progressives Congress (APC) and his role in shaping Nigeria’s political landscape have made him a recipient of numerous such honors. Whether or not he holds a specific title from the Idoma people, the IATC’s clarification suggests that any association with a revoked title is entirely unfounded.
The controversy, however fleeting, highlights the delicate balance between traditional institutions and political figures in Nigeria. Traditional rulers often navigate a complex terrain, maintaining their cultural authority while engaging with political leaders who wield significant influence. The IATC’s swift response indicates its determination to avoid being drawn into political controversies, particularly those fueled by misinformation.
The Broader Implications: Misinformation and Traditional Institutions
The incident involving President Tinubu and the Idoma Area Traditional Council is a microcosm of a larger challenge facing Nigeria: the spread of misinformation in the digital age. Social media platforms, while powerful tools for communication, have become breeding grounds for rumors and false narratives, often with significant consequences for individuals, communities, and institutions. The IATC’s experience underscores the need for vigilance and proactive communication to counter misinformation and protect the reputation of revered institutions.
For traditional institutions like the IATC, maintaining public trust is paramount. Chieftaincy titles, as symbols of honor and prestige, are deeply tied to the cultural identity of the conferring community. Any suggestion of impropriety or arbitrariness in the conferment or revocation of titles can erode public confidence and weaken the institution’s authority. By issuing a clear and unequivocal statement, the IATC has not only addressed the specific rumor but also reinforced its commitment to transparency and accountability.
The incident also raises questions about the intersection of traditional and modern governance in Nigeria. Traditional rulers, while not part of the formal political structure, play a significant role in shaping public opinion and fostering social cohesion. Their interactions with political leaders, such as the conferment of titles, are often seen as endorsements of the recipient’s contributions to society. However, these interactions can also become flashpoints for controversy, particularly when political rivalries or misinformation come into play.
The Role of the Media in Amplifying or Mitigating Misinformation
The media, both traditional and digital, plays a critical role in shaping public perceptions of events like the one involving the IATC and President Tinubu. Responsible journalism requires verifying information before publication, particularly when dealing with sensitive issues involving traditional institutions and political figures. The rapid spread of the rumor about Tinubu’s title underscores the challenges of navigating a media landscape where speed often trumps accuracy.
In this case, Nigerian News Direct played a vital role in amplifying the IATC’s clarification, ensuring that the public received accurate information from a credible source. The media’s responsibility extends beyond reporting the news to correcting falsehoods and providing context that helps readers understand the significance of the story. By publishing the IATC’s statement, the outlet contributed to restoring clarity and preventing further escalation of the controversy.
However, the incident also highlights the need for media literacy among the public. In an era where anyone can publish content online, distinguishing between credible sources and unverified rumors is more important than ever. The IATC’s call for the public to disregard the rumors serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking and skepticism when consuming information, particularly on social media.
The Cultural Significance of Chieftaincy Titles in Nigeria
To fully grasp the weight of this controversy, it is worth exploring the broader cultural significance of chieftaincy titles in Nigeria. Across the country’s diverse ethnic groups, titles such as “Ozo,” “Eze,” “Emir,” or “Chief” carry profound meaning, symbolizing not only honor but also a covenant between the recipient and the community. These titles often come with responsibilities, such as supporting community development, promoting peace, and upholding cultural values.
In Idomaland, chieftaincy titles are conferred with great ceremony, often accompanied by rituals that reflect the spiritual and cultural heritage of the people. The process is guided by tradition, with the Och’Idoma and the IATC playing a central role in ensuring that only deserving individuals are honored. The revocation of a title, while rare, is a serious matter that requires careful deliberation and adherence to established protocols.
The rumor about President Tinubu’s title, though unfounded, could have had significant cultural implications if left unaddressed. A perceived slight against a figure of Tinubu’s stature could have strained relations between the Idoma people and other ethnic groups, particularly the Yoruba, from which Tinubu hails. The IATC’s clarification, therefore, serves not only to correct the record but also to preserve the unity and mutual respect that characterize Nigeria’s diverse cultural landscape.
Looking Ahead: Strengthening Traditional Institutions in a Digital Age
The IATC’s handling of this incident offers valuable lessons for traditional institutions navigating the challenges of the digital age. First, proactive communication is essential in countering misinformation. By issuing a timely statement, the council prevented the rumor from gaining further traction and reaffirmed its authority as the arbiter of traditional matters in Idomaland.
Second, traditional institutions must continue to adapt to the realities of modern communication. Engaging with the media, both traditional and digital, allows councils like the IATC to reach a wider audience and shape the narrative surrounding their actions. Establishing official channels for communication, such as verified social media accounts or press offices, can further enhance their ability to counter misinformation.
Finally, the incident underscores the importance of collaboration between traditional institutions, the media, and the public in promoting accurate information and preserving cultural heritage. By working together, these stakeholders can ensure that the sanctity of traditional practices, such as the conferment of chieftaincy titles, is upheld in an era of rapid information exchange.
Conclusion
The Idoma Area Traditional Council’s clarification that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s name was never on a list of revoked chieftaincy titles has put an end to a potentially divisive controversy. The council’s swift and decisive response demonstrates its commitment to transparency, integrity, and the preservation of Idoma cultural values. By debunking the rumor, the IATC has not only protected its reputation but also reinforced the importance of verifying information in an age of rampant misinformation.
This incident serves as a reminder of the enduring significance of traditional institutions in Nigeria and the need to safeguard their integrity against the challenges of the digital age. As the Idoma people and their leaders continue to navigate the complexities of modern governance, their commitment to truth, unity, and cultural heritage will remain a guiding light for communities across Nigeria.
About the Author
