PTI, NEW DELHI, AUG 28, 2025 : The Supreme Court on Thursday said the term “as soon as possible” used in Article 200 of the Constitution in deciding the fate of Bills will serve no practical purpose if Governors are allowed to withhold consent for “eternity”.
A five-judge Constitution bench made the observation even as the Centre submitted that state governments cannot invoke writ jurisdiction in moving the apex court against the actions of the President and the Governor in dealing with the Bills passed by state Assemblies for violation of fundamental rights.
The apex court also said the framers of the Constitution deliberately replaced an earlier six-week limit with the phrase “as soon as possible” in Article 200 and asked the Centre whether this phrase can be ignored in deciding the fate of Bills.
Article 200 provides for the powers of the Governor regarding Bills passed by the State Legislature, allowing them to either assent to the Bill, withhold assent, return the Bill for reconsideration, or reserve the Bill for the consideration of the President.
A proviso of Article 200 says the Governor may, as soon as possible after the presentation to him of the Bill for assent, return the Bill, if it is not a Money Bill, to the House for reconsideration, and shall not withhold the consent after the Assembly reconsiders and sends it back to him.
“The question is when the Governor sits over a Bill passed by the Legislature and keeps sitting over it. The words used were ‘as soon as possible’… earlier it was six weeks and later made ‘as soon as possible’ and one of the members in the drafting committee stated ‘as soon as possible’ would mean immediately… if this was the view of the Constitution makers, then can we ignore that?” Chief Justice of India B. R. Gavai asked.
Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for Tamil Nadu, said the argument that Governors can withhold assent even to Money Bills passed by the Assembly would effectively make them a “super Chief Minister” of a state.
Withholding of a Bill must lead to returning it to the Assembly, and if the Governors are allowed to withhold their assent permanently, then it will make a mockery of the whole Article 200 and it will be swallowed by this proviso, he said.
“Otherwise, the word ‘as soon as possible’ will be rendered otiose (serving no practical purpose) if you withhold (assent) for eternity,” the CJI said.
